By studying the methods of conceptualization and the exploration of rhetorical experience, this book contributes to a better understanding of the nature and use of rhetorical rhetoric. Since World War II the traditional concepts of eloquence have been undermined, resulting in identity crisis. Instead of the comfortable assumptions shared by Aristotle, John Quincy Adams, Woodrow Wilson, and most academics, many today's scientists and sociologists have become confused about the meaning, content and scope of rhetoric even in the distinction between rhetoric and rhetoric. nonrhetorical.

Partly under the influence of logically, some critics dismissed a persuasive speech as "an anomaly in the era of such speeches as Churchill, Roosevelt, De Gaulle, and Martin Luther King." Others ignored the operative discourse in favor of biblical formation, despite the enthusiasm of the speech-makers of Yates and other literary giants Five of the chapters in this book contributed to addressing the nature of the phenomenon we call rhetoric, and five related to the useful application or values ​​of the theory of practical recruitment of rhetoric (in politics and public affairs, in social and natural sciences, in religious and moral teachings, in the collective) , In literature) and contributors, among the most prominent speakers of the nation, are James R. Andrews, Carol C.

Arnold, Lloyd F. Bitzer, Edwin Black, Douglas Ehninger, Henry W.

Johnstone, Jr., Lawrence W. Rosenfield, Robert L.

The way to summarize the letter of the book will be: Even if rhetoric does not regain its high place that embraced it in medieval trivium, it deserves much more serious attention than many modern magazines give. The position in today's curricula is ultimately assumed to be a discourse that will primarily determine the identity of his choice, the credibility of the theoretical concepts that he claims to be rhetorical, and the useful application of this theory to the Mechanism of the community.

"

I want that book.